🔗 Share this article

Protesters gathered outside the legislative building this week

Latvia's lawmakers have voted to pull out from an global treaty designed to protect women from abuse, covering family violence, following prolonged and intense debates in the parliament.

Thousands of protesters assembled in the capital this past week to voice disagreement with the vote. The ultimate decision now rests with President Edgars Rinkevics, who must determine whether to endorse or reject the legislation.

Known as the Istanbul Convention, the international accord only became active in Latvia last year, requiring governments to develop laws and assistance programs to eliminate all forms of abuse.

Latvia has become the first EU country to initiate the procedure of exiting from the convention. Turkey pulled out in 2021, a decision that rights groups described as a major regression for gender equality.

Ideological Debate and Resistance

The international agreement was ratified by the European Union in last year, yet conservative groups have contended that its focus on equal rights undermines family values and advances what they term "gender ideology".

Following a lengthy discussion in the Saeima, MPs decided by a margin of 56-32 to exit from the convention, a action sponsored by opposition parties but supported by politicians from one of the three governing partners.

The result represents a setback for moderate conservative Prime Minister the nation's PM, who stood with demonstrators outside the legislature earlier this seven-day period. "We will not surrender, we will continue fighting so that abuse does not triumph," she declared to the crowd.

Political Divisions and Responses

One of the main political groups supporting the withdrawal is a nationalist party, whose leader has called on the public to choose between what he terms a "natural family" and "gender ideology with multiple sexes".

Latvia's human rights commissioner Karina Palkova urged the agreement not to be politicized, while the group Equality Now stated it was "not a threat to national principles, it served as a tool to realize them".

The recent decision has provoked broad outcry both inside Latvia and abroad.

22,000 individuals have endorsed a national appeal demanding the treaty to be preserved. The women's rights organization Centrs Marta has called a protest for the coming week, charging MPs of ignoring the wishes of the Latvian people.

Global Concerns and Potential Next Steps

The leader of the European organization's parliamentary assembly stated that the Baltic state had made a rash choice driven by false information. He characterized it as an "never-before-seen and extremely worrying step backward for women's rights and human rights in the continent".

He added that since Turkey abandoned the treaty four years ago, cases of femicide and abuse targeting females had increased significantly.

Because the decision did not achieve a supermajority majority, the head of state could possibly return the bill for additional review if he has objections.

President the national leader announced on digital platforms that he would assess the vote according to legal requirements, "taking into account governmental and judicial considerations, rather than ideological or political perspectives".

Recently, another member of the governing alliance, the Progressives, indicated it would not exclude appealing to the Constitutional Court.

"This vote represents a concerning situation for women's rights not only in our nation but throughout the continent," commented a human rights advocate.

• Family violence statistics have been rising in multiple EU nations
• The Istanbul Convention mandates particular safeguards for victims of gender-based violence
• Latvia's decision could influence comparable discussions in additional EU countries